Blackberry or Treo. I won't pasken on
this vexing contemporary shayla.
Either way, it is the business of a
multi-billion dollar enterprise, the memory
industry. Capitalizing on human frailty, the
PDA offers compensation; in a world moving
ever so quickly, we dare not forget that
crucial meeting nor miss that all-important
birthday (anniversary, wedding or bar
mitzvah...).
Ours is a nation of memory. We remember the
good and the painful. In our Purim buildup,
prior to the intoxicating festivities, we
commence with a sobering and classic parsha
of memory, one that speaks of paradoxical
dual obligations to completely wipe out
Amalek while being charged to always
remember them [Devarim, 25:17-19]
[Zachor]
Remember
what Amalek perpetrated against you on
the road when you were going out of
Egypt. When they chanced upon you
on the road ; they struck
down your appendage--- all the feeble ones
behind you--- and you were exhausted and
wearied, and they had no fear of G-d. When
Ad-noy, your G-d, has given you repose from
all your enemies around, in the land that
Ad-noy, your G-d, is giving you as territory
to inherit, you shall
obliterate the memory of Amalek from
beneath the sky; [lo tishkach] do not
forget.
Much is striking about this formulation.
Alshich lists twenty plus questions on the
commandment. Herein, five notable inquiries:
a. Why is this enemy (Amalek) different from
all others?
b. If we must destroy then, of what purpose
is memory?
c. Why the preoccupation with our location
(being "on the road"?
d. We are to obliterate them from
"underneath the heavens" seems obvious; what
are the other options ?
e. Why the double terminology - zachor
(remember) and lo tishkach
(do not forget).
Our final question (e.) is not a halachic
inquiry. Often the Torah will couch its
obligations in a classic double
[positive-negative] formulation. Consider:
a. Remember the Shabbos, nor may
you violate it. B. Place a parapet
around your house and do not place blood in
your home. c. Return the lost object
and do not hide from your obligation of
return. Similarly, zachor..al
tishkach may be rendered "Remember what
Amalek did and do not forget them".
Indeed, Rambam, Chinuch, and Semag all
classify the Amalek memory imperative as
distinct positive and negative obligations.
Nevertheless, what passes halachic muster
still begs for philosophical clarity! We
must question the necessity of the two
pronged obligation?
First, a simple Talmudic piece [Megillah
18a]:
'Remember' [zachor]- Am I to say, this
means only with the mind? When the text
says, "you shall not forget", the
injunction against mental forgetfulness is
already given. What then does 'remember'
mean? This must mean, by utterance.
In other words, zachor-remember
is the obligation to articulate
while lo tishkach-do no forget
encompasses latent memory.
Thought without articulation is not
sufficient to fulfill the positive mitzvah
of remembering Amalek, but would qualify as
a fulfillment of the negative commandment[1]..
We will revisit this distinction. For a
moment, let's move to our first question:
Wherein lay Amalek's uniqueness?
A
brief exploration of his roots yields a
clue. First, the text: [Bereishis, 36:12]
And Timna was a
concubine to Eliphaz, son of Esau, and she
bore to Eliphaz,
Amalek.
Then the Talmud (Sanhedrin 99b)
And Lotan's sister was Timna? - Timna was a
royal princess .. Desiring to become a
proselyte, she went to Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob, but they did not accept her. So she
went and became a concubine to Eliphaz the
son of Eisav, saying, 'I had rather be a
servant to this people than a mistress of
another nation.' From her Amalek was
descended who afflicted Israel.
Amalek emerges from Eisav, Yisrael's
antithesis. Disdaining all things spiritual,
Eisav rejects the birthright precisely for
its lack of present-worldly value.[2].
But Eisav alone does not create Amalek. His
son Eliphaz marries Timna. - a woman
who seeks purpose, and is rejected by
Avraham. She bonds with Eliphaz. Together
they have Amalek. Timna bequeaths to
Amalek the gift of passion and purpose.
Witness that both Bnei Yisrael and Amalek
are called a nation of firsts (reishis)
When he (Bilaam) looked on Amalek, .. and
said, Amalek was the first of the nations; [Bamidbar,
25:20]
Israel is holy to the Lord, and the first
fruits of His produce;
[Yirmiyahu, 2:3]
First, as in primary! Both possess a
sense of mission and sacrifice. Rashi's
famous midrash declares:
They cooled you, moderated you to tepidness
from seething heat. For all the nations were
afraid of waging war against you, until they
commenced, preparing the way for others.
This is compared with a boiling bath into
which no creature could enter. One villain
came and leaped into it. Although he was
scalded, he cooled it for the others.
And what does Amalek seek? It's a long
story, but here's the upshot: Amalek raison
d'etre is to wreak havoc upon faith and the
faithful. Amalek's weltanschauung is the
random world, perceiving history as a
capricious set of events without ultimate
rhyme or purpose. Amalek-world champions
safek (Doubt); both (Amalek
and safek) possess the same
gematria (numeric equivalent value =
240); Amalek desires to insinuate doubt in
the believer's world and to ultimately sever
one's connection with the Divine.
Rabbinic literature thus equates Amalek with
yetzer hara and the primordial
serpent, the nachash. That which
prompts the Amalek reminder immediately
before Purim, is the belief in randomness,
mikreh - a word that binds
Haman to his ancestor Amalek. [Esther, 4:7]
And Mordecai told him of all that had
happened to him [karahu]. He said to
Hatach: ' Go and say to her: "The
descendant of karahu has come upon you,"'
In a random world, reflection, spirituality,
morality and all things good are ultimately
meaningless. Perhaps a social contract may
be necessary but that is pragmatic not
philosophical, technical and not fundamental
Finally, Amalek catches us on the road;
an utterly trivial statement - unless one
considers that it is the road to Sinai!
The epic battle between Amalek and Yisrael
takes place on our road. Amalek's
mission: to get us off the road. For the
Jew, our world is a pathway to purpose; for
Amalek, the here and now is not a conduit -
it is home sweet home. Amalek's antipathy
for us is because we transform their homes
into our roads - a spiritual eminent domain
without compensation!
Here we return to our zachor/al tishkach
double obligation:
A
friend calls. Struggling in a downward
spiral and enmeshed in an unbelievably
painful personal reevaluation of his path,
he is now on the mend. We speak tachlis!
[briefly and sincerely]; he formulates a
gem: "The source of all my problems (and
there were many) began when I distanced
myself from God. When I was down, I
always knew God was in my life. Then I felt
in control, I told God: I'll take over now.
That was the moment it all began to slip
away."
Zachor, a verbal repudiation of Amalek
requires clarity. In pristine moments,
dispelling Amalek is easy, while doubt seems
inconceivable. When are those moments? For
some, they might come davka amidst a
sea of engulfing difficulties so
overwhelming that there is only God to turn
to. Others find God amidst serenity and
simcha. Either way, when God feels close,
it is hard to imagine there is any room for
Amalek.
Amalek however is patient; it preys on the
weak ones and pounces during times of
weakness. It is when clarity yields to
muddle and pristine to puzzlement, that the
Torah mandates lo tishkach[3].
Hold on. You may not be able to see Hashem
and articulate the clarity; He might seem so
distant, but do not shut Him out.
As we move on to Megillat Esther (the
revelation of the hidden), may the inner
Amalek, the looming doubts that may plague
us mitachat hashamayim, in our
this-worldly existence of God's concealment,
be defeated!
A
Freilichen Purim!
Good Shabbos - Asher Brander
[1]
This indeed is the explicit position
of Minchas Chinuch and others:
[2]
cf. midrash rabah and Eisav said:
behold, I am at the point to die,
etc. (ib. 32). resh lakish said: he
began to revile and blaspheme: it is
not written, ' what is [the
birthright] to me, but, what is this
to me-zeh (this teaches that he
denied him of whom it is written,
this is my god-zeh eli (ex. xv, 2).)
[3]
Perhaps one can even posit that one
must engage in zachor to the point
that is lo tishkach, i.e. when you
are in clarity mode, embed the
emunah so deeply so that you will
ultimately not forget even in times
of concealment.