Here's an obvious question. We bring a
sacrifice (korban) for a particular
category of unintentional sin[1]
[chatas]. Why? Certainly, No harm was
intended and none, ostensibly was done. The
knowledgeable may thrust back: adam muad
l'olam! i.e. man is always culpable for
damages he wreaked, irrelevant of intention!
Our obvious parry is: those situations have
an other. No chatas sin has an other
- they are all in the realm of man-God.
Answers abound:
a.
Every unintentional sin possesses a degree
of negligence. [You may oversleep minyan,
but you are far less likely to oversleep the
plane flight]
b.
An unintentional sin is a pause for
reflection: [How did I get to the point
that I violated such a strict aveirah? Is
God trying to tell me something? Minimally,
he is trying to tell me - ]
Before we present a 3rd approach,
let us pose a simple textual question: The
Torah introduces the chatas section:
[4:1]
If a soul [nefesh] unwittingly transgresses
any commandment of Ad-noy which should not
be done and commits one of these sins.
Man
is described as nefesh in contrast to
the more classical ish or even
adam[2]
[which is used for the general intro] Ramban
explains the precision wording:
"because the thought emanates from the soul
and it was the soul that was mistaken, thus
the Torah employs the term soul. And the
reason for a sacrifice for the soul that
sins unintentionally is because all sins
create a degradation in the soul and they
are a blemish to it; the soul will not be
able to greet its Creator unless it is tahar
(cleansed) from sin."
In
other words: every sin has one prime
casualty: the soul. Unintentional sins may
not be the function of a weak or errant
conscious decision, but nevertheless, they
create metaphysical wreckage[3];
they harm the sensitive soul[4].
Ramban's simple, but ingenious proof is a
classic reduction to the absurd
argument:
Were an unintentional sin to be harmless,
ignorance would equal halachic bliss! That
preposterous notion would exalt ignorance to
a desired state. In Torah-truth however,
what I don't know will hurt me, for what the
body doesn't feel, the soul does.
The
powerful notion of the soul sensitivity
flows in several directions:
1.
The neshama tehora, the pristine soul
is God's great gift to man. Davka through
its sensitive nature is the neshama able to
elevate a functional animal [the body] into
a tzelem elokim; [Divine image]. Our
propensity for selflessness, sacrifice,
heroism, and empathy has no real analog in
the animal world. Most significantly is the
line the traditional Jew says every morning
in praise of the soul in the classical
prayer Elokai Neshama
kol zeman
shehaneshama bikirbi, modeh ani
lefanecha
So long as the
soul is within me, I admit/thank you
While I have the soul, I acknowledge
ultimate connectedness, i.e. my inextricable
link to Hashem.
2.
The flip side to that soul-sensitivity is
that it is very sensitive. Try
talking to sensitive people: They may be the
nurse, the kindergarten teachers or the
simple baker/candlestick maker [do they
exist anymore?]. Sensitive people discern
and read beyond the articulated word; they
laugh with the joy-ful and cry with the
bereaved. But those very same people who are
moved to tears for others can cry really
quickly for themselves. Thus, the Talmud
teaches that one's wife's tears are always
close by, for it is that degree of
sensitivity needed to mother her children.
A
final thought: Yesterday, a great and
holy Jew, Rav Elya Svei passed away. He was
an outspoken leader for Torah Jewry ; a man
of piety and integrity.
I speak to a friend today who mourns the
fact that he is so unmoved by loss of such a
great Jew. He knows what to feel. He simply
can't find the time and way to feel it. I
try to comfort him: We are the generation of
the heel of the messiah. The heel is the
least sensitive part of the body. Every
little thing we feel goes along way.
As
we lurch towards Mashiach, may God remove
the barriers from the collective soul of
Klal Yisrael.
Good Shabbos - Asher Brander
[1]
It might rise to the level of sin
that carries with it karet or above
were it to be violated
intentionally.
[2]
Which is the terms the Torah uses to
introduce the whole notions of
sacrifices [Vayikra, 1:2]
[3]
Rav Soloveivchik framed this notion
in classic terms. Sin creates
consequence and distance. Teshuva
thus needs to atone and to purify [kapara/tahara].
The former erases punishment while
the latter removes the impurities.
[4]
Remarkably, even tough mitzvos might
harm the soul. Consider the idea a.
that King David was not allowed to
build the beit hamikdash because he
spilled much blood [legally!], b.
the Talmud links shechita with rough
tendencies c. the Torah promises
those who mete out tough judgment
upon the idolatrous city, that they
shall be cloaked with a blanket of
mercy; ergo without the
Torah's promise, the act of killing
would have created deleterious
spiritual tendencies. A similar
notion can be stated with regard to
Pinchas and his covenant of peace
[cf. Netziv, Devarim 13]