Moshe is an unwilling leader. Rather
than campaigning for the position, he
argues the counter. In the end, he loses
his argument with God [a fairly
predictable conclusion] and emerges as
our greatest leader in Jewish History -
bringing a bedraggled and downwardly
mobile people out of Egypt, forging them
into a nation, facilitating Matan Torah,
nobly defending them, and finally
departing the scene with his beloved
people perched at the doorstep of Eretz
Yisrael.
As Moshe's arguments melt away and the
dawning realization occurs to Moshe that
he must lead, he poses to God a
curious question:
Moshe said to El-him, "Behold, when I
come to the B'nei Yisrael and say to
them, 'The G-d of your fathers sent me
to you,' they will say to me, 'What is
His name?' What shall I say to them?"
Curious,
for one wonders who the intended
audience is and with what are they
grappling? It seems unlikely that they
are questioning Moshe's authenticity -
for that conversation takes place a few
verses forward: [4:1-3]
Moshe answered and said, "They will not
believe me. They will not listen to my
voice. They will say, 'Ad-noy did not
appear to you.' Ad-noy said to him,
"What is that in your hand?" He said, "A
rod."[G-d] said, "Throw it on the
ground." He [Moshe] threw it on the
ground and it turned into a snake. Moshe
ran away from it.
Nor does it seem plausible that the
question is one of how can I prove to
them Your (God's) authenticity for
God's answer does not provide an
apparent solution:
El-him said to Moshe, "E-heyeh
Asher E-heyeh; [lit. I shall be whom I
shall be]" and He said, "This is
what you must say to the B'nei Yisrael,
'E-heyeh sent me to you.' "
Most of us probably know someone who
claims that he has spoken to God [or
speaks for God]. The non believer,
Rabbeinu Bechayei points out, can not
possibly be moved by Moshe's claim that
Hashem appeared to him - for it is
unverifiable. And for the believer, the
response appears superfluous[1]?!
Finally, we must understand a double -
double - single.
a.
Double
- Why the double terminology of E-heyeh
asher E-heyeh ? [a phrase that the
Shulchan Aruch notes has the complete
status of God's name].
b.
Double
- The second double, a bit more subtle
appears after Hashem gives the E-heyeh
answer, he gives yet a second answer to
Moshe's question of what is His name:
El-him continued talking to Moshe, "This
is what you must say to the B'nei
Yisrael, 'Ad-noy, the G-d of your
fathers, the G-d of Avraham, the G-d of
Yitzchok, and the G-d of Yaakov, sent me
to you. This is My eternal Name, and
this is how I am to be mentioned for all
generations.' "
c. Single - After Hashem relates
to Moshe he is the double E-heyeh
-, he tells Moshe to tell Bnei
Yisrael a single E-heyeh.
Rambam in Moreh Nevuchim begins:
When God appeared to Moshe .. to bring
them the message, Moses replied
that he might first be asked to prove
the existence of God in the Universe.
For all men, with few
exceptions, were ignorant of the
existence of God; their highest thoughts
did not extend beyond the heavenly
sphere, its forms or its influences.
They could not yet emancipate themselves
from sensation, and had not yet attained
to any intellectual perfection. Then God
taught Moses how to teach them .. by
saying Ehyeh asher Ehyeh, a name derived
from the verb hayah in the sense of
"existing," for the verb hayah denotes
"to be," and in Hebrew no difference is
made between the verbs "to be" and "to
exist." .. The first noun which is to be
described is ehyeh; the second, by which
the first is described, is likewise
ehyeh, .. This is, therefore,
the expression of the idea that God
exists, but not in the ordinary sense of
the term; or, in other words, He is "the
existing Being which is
the existing Being," that is to
say, the Being whose existence is
absolute. The proof which he was to give
consisted in demonstrating that there is
a Being of absolute existence, that has
never been and never win be without
existence.
Prior to the message of Divine
redemption, Moshe must prove to Bnei
Yisrael the existence of God. It would
seem that for Rambam, Moshe's audience
are the non-believers and his
task is to teach them emunah.
Ramban emphatically rejects this:
How can it be that the Elders of Israel
would doubt the existence of God and his
Providence - for they are wise and
recipients of the tradition from their
forefathers?
Two solutions for Rambam: Either Moshe
is teaching Bnei Yisrael - the
foundations of intellectual faith.
Surely, they were believers - but Moshe
was teaching them how to prove God's
existence [something that we will not
discuss in this context].
Another solution [my admitted
preference]. Perhaps, the Rambam's point
is not a simple belief in his existence
- but in the nature of His existence.
Moshe is teaching Bnei Yisrael -
the believers, those that take God's
existence as axiomatic, the deep notion
that belief in God is not merely a
reality amongst other realities.
God does not merely exist. He is the
only essential existence
Things that exist can either be
contingent or necessary. A contingent
being is dependent upon something else
for its existence. We are all
contingent; We need air to exist;
without trees there would be no air;
without water there would be no trees;
without oxygen there would be no
water..; We need parents to exist and
our parents needed their parents.. (you
get the picture). That God exists was
clear to Moshe's audience. That God
is essential and not contingent was the
point that Moshe sought to emphasize.
For the implications of God's
essentialness are critical: an
essential God means that everything is
dependent upon Him and nothing exists
without Him. In our lexicon: Ein
Od Milevado. Thus Moshe, on the cusp
of liberating his people reminds them:
Jews, as you are mired in the morass of
Egypt - understand that Hashem is behind
it all. Everything comes from Him; do
not get caught up in the smokescreen.
You may not comprehend the purpose and
meaning of the Egyptian exile;
nevertheless please recognize that it
has meaning and that it too comes from
God. And just like He put you in - He
can take you out!
Ramban goes with a different approach.
Moshe's question is for the believer: It
is a simple and poignant one.
As Divine proxy, who may I ask, am I
representing? There are many apparent
aspects of God: there is the patient
Hashem - Shakkai; there is the God of
Judgment - Elokim; there is the God of
mercy - YKVK. There is the hidden
presence [as He appeared to the
Patriarchs/Matriarch] and the manifest
presence [as I experience Him now]. As I
am to embark upon my mandated role as
redeemer of Israel, please give me and
them a picture of what to expect.
Hashem's answer is that I am judgment
which shall be mercy. You might
perceive me in one particular fashion -
through your limited perspective, but
there is ultimate unity. It is
your job, Moshe to see that achdus.
When you present me to Bnei Yisrael, do
not use the double E-heyeh, that is too
complicated for them. To the people,
present Me as merciful, but you must
know that ultimately all the pictures
merge. E-heyeh asher E-heyeh - My
Being now, even as it appears to you as
judgment, is the same as the Being of
mercy.
One final piece - why the double answer?
Rabbeinu Bechayei cryptically
distinguishes between muskal and
mekubal. Perhaps his point is
that many Jews are fine with
apprehending Hashem through their
parents' lens. They are simple and
beautiful people who have no need for
fancy philosophy, in depth cosmology, or
any such sundry topic. This is Hashem's
second answer. For those that ask what
is Hashem's essence, the answer is that
He is the same God that your father
believed in. Beautiful unvarnished
emunah peshuta - I believe because
my father believed. This is what he
calls the derech hamekubal.
And what of those who don't trust their
father - for whom simpl faith is simply
not enough? The answer, Hashem says is
E-heyeh asher Eheyeh - they can find Me
themselves, through their own probing
and soul-searching. I can be located
says Hashem, everywhere you look for Me.
I am where I am - which is everywhere.
In the words of the Kotzker Rebbe, where
is God? wherever you let
him in.
Armed with answers for the searching
faithful - Moshe the redeemer begins his
mission. Let us complete it speedily in
our days.
Good Shabbos - Asher Brander
[1]
Maimonides in Moreh Nevuchim
[1:63] formulates it as such:
Moses was correct in declaring,
"But, behold, they will not
believe me, for they will say,
The Lord hath not appeared unto
thee" (ib. iv. 1); for
any man claiming the authority
of a prophet must expect to meet
with such an objection so long
as he has not given a proof of
his mission. Again, if the
question, as appears at first
sight, referred only to the
name, as a mere utterance of the
lips, the following dilemma
would present itself:
either the Israelites knew the
name, or they had never heard
it: if the name was known to
them, they would perceive in it
no argument in favour of the
mission of Moses, his knowledge
and their knowledge of the
divine name being the same. If,
on the other hand, they had
never heard it mentioned, and if
the knowledge of it was to prove
the mission of Moses, what
evidence would they have that
this was really the name of God?
Moreover, after God had
made known that name to Moses,
and had told him, "Go and gather
the elders of Israel. . . . and
they shall hearken to thy voice"
(ib. xvi. 18), he
replied, "Behold, they will not
believe me nor hearken unto my
voice," although God had told
him, "And they will hearken to
thy voice"; whereupon God
answered, "What is that in thine
hand?" and he said, "A rod" (ib.
iv. 2).